Re: [CR]re:schwinn superior

(Example: Component Manufacturers:Ideale)

Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 08:23:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Fred Rafael Rednor" <fred_rednor@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]re:schwinn superior
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
In-Reply-To: 6667


I agree that this was a great find. The one real question I have pertains to the upper of the 2 rear brake bridges. I think this is the 3rd Superior I've seen. (Well I've seen one "in person" and now 2 in photos) Each had a different treatment for the rear brake bridge.

One had a more normal looking single brake bridge, although that one seems to have an additional piece brazed onto the actual brake bridge tube. And, if I recall correctly, one had no provisions for any rear brake whatsoever. Which is the original style? Or can it be that there were multiple types available at different times?
      Cheers,
      Fred Rednor - Arlington, Virginia (USA)


--- marc garcia wrote:


> I think you got a pretty damn good buy. I would have
> bought it without hesitation. I'm probably not in the
> majority on this but I think there's possibly enough
> of the original paint to leave it. I would clean it,
> and wax and see how it looks then. I'm a sucker for
> original paint, and once you strip it, it's gone
> forever, you can never get it back.
>
> As to originality, it sound's like the hubs could be
> original but I think they were relaced at some point,
> right?
>
> I love ebay stories like this, it's just how I got my
> raleigh pro. 250.00 buy it now and i was the first
> person to view the auction at 3:30 AM.
>
> marc garcia
> chicago IL
> _______________________________________________
>

Yahoo! Mail Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour: http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html