[CR]Re: Classicrendezvous Digest, Vol 29, Issue 96

(Example: Framebuilders)

Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 15:47:51 -0400
From: <ritzmon@aol.com>
References: <MONKEYFOODrjxZ96YJt00001e5a@monkeyfood.nt.phred.org>
In-Reply-To:
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: [CR]Re: Classicrendezvous Digest, Vol 29, Issue 96

Mark said,

snip<Back in the Late Jurrassic period, I read a magazine article (Bicycling? Consumers Reports?) about helmet testing. Don't remember who did the testing either.

Anyway, they used some sort of an accellerometer, inside a head shaped weight which was dropped from 3 feet and 6 feet. IRRC the weight was on an arm so they could control where it hit, and it wasn't in the top.

When they dropped the SL from 3 feet they got higher readings than with the other helmets at 6 feet. They did not test the SL at 6 feet for fear of damaging their equipment.>end snip.

It was Bike World magazine and the SkidLid was the only helmet tested thatr actually INCREASED the readings over a bare head...

Cheers, Mark "used to wear a Brancale" Ritz Arcata, CA home of the Great Kinetic Sculpture Race this weekend