David,
The link appears to be splitting across two lines, and only the first
half is being made active - I get a warning that the page is no longer available. Try adding pointed brackets < > - I can't remember
the correct name for them - before and after the pasted link for example ; <http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/dddd@pacbell.net/ album?.dirJd2&.src=ph&store=&prodid=&.done=http%> and I think you'll find this will keep the link complete even if the text word warps across two lines.
Regards
Bob Reid Stonehaven Scotland
On 27 Jun 2005, at 07:24, dddd wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: dddd
> To: kurt@fineartscrimshaw.com
> Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 11:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [CR]Re: PX10 photos full-size,(really)
>
>
> Can a link work internally only within one's computer? I only ask
> because these links work for me. In fact, they load really fast,
> despite
> my computer having been re-booted since I revised my Yahoo album.
>
> Here's links to the two albums with the 3 pictures:
>
> http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/
> h&store=&prodid=&.done=http%
>
> http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/
> h&store=&prodid=&.done=http%
>
> When I do a right-click on the image of the 21" PX10, and then
> "properties" and ctrl-C (copy to notepad) on the URL, followed by
> pasting the URL to the header on my browser, the photo comes up as
> if I
> just clicked on the link(s) here. Could my computer be the only one
> that works this way? FWIW, the album is designated "public" on Yahoo,
> but since I'm dealing with Yahoo/SBC, my ISP, who knows?
>
> This sure wouldn't be the first time my attempts to do seemingly
> simple
> computer tasks met with failure. Anyone who can't access these links
> care to comment? It may be that I have to create URL links to the
> albums, not individual photos. Thankfully, the albums are small, each
> one titled corresponding to it's date of creation.
>
> Thanks for the notice. Do you get an access warning?
>
> David Snyder
> Auburn, CA USA
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Kurt Sperry
> Subject: Re: [CR]Re: PX10 photos full-size,(really)
>
>
> Those links are dead.
>
> Kurt Sperry
>
>
> On 6/26/05, dddd <dddd@pacbell.net> wrote:
> I identified the URL's for the actual photos, not just the
> thumbnails.
> Sorry for the mistake.
>
> The email client will usually highlight only the first line unless
> this page
> is maximized.
>
> Here's the old "21 inch" one:
>
> http://us.f3.yahoofs.com/
> 63e3.jpg?phti
> 0vCBhhx4IUVB
>
> Here's the "new" 1970 "58cm"
>
> http://us.f3.yahoofs.com/
> 9deb.jpg?phti
> 0vCBCH.mOKS7
>
> And here's the Raleigh Pro from 6 weeks ago, after cleaning it up:
>
> http://us.f3.yahoofs.com/
> 3fe9.jpg?phti
> 0vCB0dF7VrSE
>
> The good news for me (since I had been looking for a non-existent
> 57cm
> for some time!) is that this 58cm with it's 58cm TT has a layed
> back
> 72.5-degree seat tube angle which effectively makes the top tube a
> cm or
> so shorter and will allow me to fit a sanded-down-to-fit 1A stem,
> either
> a 9cm or 10cm that I have gathering dust. I think the 10cm
> measures
> 9.5cm by the contemporary measuring method (on center with the
> extension) so that should be perfect with a model 66 bar.
>
> I put a current Record-10 wheelset on to make the angle
> measurements
> (the
> head angle was
> 73, btw) and that should make for a funny looking photo. I sat on
> the
> bike and the size feels right. The previous owner must have
> been my
> size
> judging by the seat height. Glad I bought it!.
>
> Thanks for all the info on these bikes. I imagine they all came
> with
> sewups, but I notice that they also take 27" wheels like they were
> made
> for them. Big tires no problem, either. Is this a do-it-all
> bike,
> or
> what?
>
> David Snyder
> Auburn, CA USA
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jerome & Elizabeth Moos
> Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 11:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [CR]Brought a new ((PX-10)) baby home Saturday
>
>
> In the US by 1972, the PX-10 was definitely available in 21",
> which
> was probably 52cm or 54 cm.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jerry Moos
> Houston, TX
>
> kim klakow <Akimbo71@gmx.net > wrote:
> According to the Dutch Peugeot catalog of 1970 the PX-10 was
> equipped with a
> Brooks pro and came in 56, 58 and 60 cm heights (available in
> other
> sizes
> with custon order and long wait).
> In 73 it was either Brooks Pro or Ideale 90, as Jerry already
> said,
> and the
> stock frame sizes were 56, 58, 60 and 64cm.
> In 75 the Saddle was a Ideale 2001 and the frame sizes the
> same.
> By 77 the frame sizes had increased to from 52-64 in 2cm
> increments.
> Same
> Saddle.
>
> that's all from me .
>
> kim
>
> --
> Kim Klakow
>
> Diplom Grafik Designer
> Akimbo71@gmx.net
> +49172-1786481
> Berlin - Germany
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html
> ---
> _______________________________________________
> Classicrendezvous mailing list
> Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> http://www.bikelist.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Classicrendezvous mailing list
> Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> http://www.bikelist.org/
>
>
>
>
> --
> fineartscrimshaw.com