Re: [CR]At what size did they go from SL to SP?

(Example: Production Builders:Pogliaghi)

Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:41:53 -0500
From: "John Thompson" <JohnThompson@new.rr.com>
Organization: The Crimson Permanent Assurance
To: classic list <Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: Re: [CR]At what size did they go from SL to SP?
References: <BAY109-F26E6734B1E5E4B018BD742B5BE0@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To:


Patrick Lay wrote:
> As I wander through the acquisition maze that is ebay, I find that this
> question sometimes stops me from bidding. I can ride a 57, 58, or 59 c
> to c. I love SL and some SL SP combinations. but all SP beats me up too
> much on long rides! I know from the archives that Medici , for example,
> went to all SP at about 59, so I did not bid on two of these that were
> recently up. So the question would apply to Masi, Colnago, DeRosa, Gios
> etc. just toward the end of the timeline. I know as the 80s progressed
> there was more danger of getting something with a harsher ride as the
> dastardly bike magazines all seemed to decide that racing bikes all had
> to be criterium ready with upright angles, unyielding tubing high,
> bottom brackets, and hairtrigger handling. I know that the US factories
> and the Japanese bent to this fad, but what about these and other
> Italian builders??

FWIW, at Trek we used SL for frame sizes up to 58cm; 60cm and larger used SP.

--

-John Thompson (john@os2.dhs.org)
Appleton WI USA