Bruce Gordon wrote:
>
(snip)
> These are just a few that I noticed. But after reading CR posts - what
> makes this frame great is that it resembles an old Cinelli, as far as
> filemarks go.
> Don't get me wrong - I'm not saying that this is a poor frame.
> Just that I could never send out a frame with that many "flaws". I am just
> amazed what people will overlook in the work of a "Supposed Legend".
> Maybe I'm just too picky??
Here's an earlier Nagasawa that looks without flaw:
http://www.cycles-yokoo.co.jp/
Head and seat lugs:
http://www.cycles-yokoo.co.jp/
If the object is to smooth something and it still has marks when finished, then they weren't really finished. A case of "good enough"? If it is really finished then there wouldn't be the debate over what is "good enough."
I'm with you here Bruce. If you notice a flaw, then you correct it before sending it out for someone else to discover.
Old Cinellis are more a case of what we here in SoCal call "it is what it is." Gouges on the underside of the bottom bracket shell are tolerated not revered (and also not removed during restoration to make the frame into something it wasn't).
ps check out the head and seat lugs on Toshio Yokoo's '72 De Rosa for
some "it is what it is"...
http://www.cycles-yokoo.co.jp/
Chuck Schmidt South Pasadena, Southern California
.