[CR]Fw: perfect? what's that?

(Example: History:Norris Lockley)

From: "C. Andrews" <chasds@mindspring.com>
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:37:47 -0800
Subject: [CR]Fw: perfect? what's that?

Richard ordered me to keep it on-list. And who am I to disobey the man who is second only to the Omnipotent Despot of New York? Nobody. Nothing. Less than nothing.

Charles Andrews
SoCal


----- Original Message -----
From: richardsachs@juno.com
To: chasds@mindspring.com
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: perfect? what's that?



>
> keep it onlist
>
> -- "C. Andrews" <chasds@mindspring.com> wrote:
> you guys wrote:
>
> Michael D. Schmidt wrote:
> This idea has been floated at least once but shot down as
> the KOF
> guys see Le Cirque as a chance to get away from "the office"
> for a
> few days of fun. Can't blame them.
> =====
>
> it's not that. i guess maybe that's "part of it" though.
> when the op added, "I am not qualified to judge or even
> suggest rules for such a contest...", i'll add that i
> wouldn't want to hang with anyone that thought they <were>
> qualified for this task.
> e-RICHIE
>
> *********
>
> part of why this keeps coming up is because we're discussing
> matters of taste, and since everyone's taste is somewhat
> different....... the subject cannot be exhausted. For me
> and for most of us I suspect *perfect* is dependent on the
> weather, time-of-day, time-of-year, and our mood. Sometimes
> *perfect* is this Bruce Gordon NOS frame I have here that I
> admire daily. Sometimes it's things like the 1969 Pogliaghi
> road tandem I picked up this weekend..crude as all get-out,
> but *perfect* of its kind..
>
> And mojo? That Pogliaghi has so much mojo my garage is
> gonna be radioactive before too long..<g>
>
> c