Re: [CR]Was Automoto now Mixte vs Ladies

(Example: Framebuilding:Tubing:Falck)

Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 15:01:34 -0800 (PST)
From: "Fred Rafael Rednor" <fred_rednor@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Was Automoto now Mixte vs Ladies
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
In-Reply-To: <8C7AD3CCB5FF2FA-17A0-292F7@MBLK-M16.sysops.aol.com>


> Why not call a Mixte frame what > it really is, a Cross frame (no not cyclocross). > > this link explains it better: > > http://www.rijwiel.net/kruisfre.htm

Perhaps because while you can argue that all mixtes are cross-frames, not all cross-frames are mixtes?

That is a cool Web site, though.

But please allow me to ask you this: Isn't it enough of a problem with derailleur vs. changer, seat post vs. seat pin, seat tube vs. seat mast, fixed gear vs. fixed wheel, and so forth? :-D
      Cheers,
      Fred Rednor - Arlington, Virginia, USA (or is that in America?)