Re: [CR]does this sachs look correctly dated to you?

(Example: History:Norris Lockley)

Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 19:21:48 -0500
From: <oroboyz@aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <20051106000242.19375.qmail@web33115.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]does this sachs look correctly dated to you?
To: crispyflotilla@yahoo.com, Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
cc: richardsachs@juno.com

That seller ought to issue a barf bag with his item descriptions. Hyperbole was never this awful. What a shame with a nice piece of metal work underneath that crappy paint. I bet Richie shudders seeing those nasty pin stripes. That guy got hold of old decals methinks. the year may be correct, just not the "transfers"

Dale Brown Greensboro, NC USA

-----Original Message----- From: r garni <crispyflotilla@yahoo.com> To: Sadiq Gill <sadiqgill@gmail.com>; Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org Sent: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 16:02:42 -0800 (PST) Subject: [CR]does this sachs look correctly dated to you?

Not to be nit picky, or knick picky (British), but this doesn't seem like an '84 to me ...how about everyone else?

http://ebay.com/<blah> mZ7193819764QQcategoryZ98084QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

I guess we actually have an in-house authority to give a deciding vote here...

We won't discuss what 'fantastic condition' means ... unless we want to...

Ricky Garni
Carrboro, NC