Re: [CR]Period correct and weight

(Example: Framebuilding)

Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:27:20 +0100 (MET)
From: "kim klakow" <Akimbo71@gmx.net>
To: Steve Leitgen <sleitgen@charter.net>
References: <3d43cdfe3d16c7496b1bcebe449c365d@charter.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]Period correct and weight
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

So this ties into the thread that Chuck and Jan are currently battling out; If Eddy Merckx would have weighed as much while going for his hour record as he did in 1983, would the excess helped to maintain momentum? Was he more aerodynamic/"drop" shaped?

just thoughts, kim


> I like to think I'm more aerodynamic. And everyone knows an aerodynamic
> addition increases weigh.
>
> Steve Leitgen
> La Crosse, WI
>
>
> On Nov 10, 2005, at 5:46 AM, kim klakow wrote:
>
> > Who still weighs as much as they did in the cut-off date in 1983?
> > I've gained a lot, but then again I was only 12.
> >
> > Kim "original rust" Klakow
> >
> >
> > Pete wrote:
> >
> >> 1970 Piaget or something. And let my hair grow to a suitable '70s
> >> length
> >> ,
> >> too. So Nick... I'm with you, bro. Just don't stop at the bike.
> >
> > --
> > Kim Klakow
> >
> > Diplom Grafik Designer
> > Akimbo71@gmx.net
> > +49172-1786481
> > Berlin - Germany
> >
> > Telefonieren Sie schon oder sparen Sie noch?
> > NEU: GMX Phone_Flat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/telefonie
> > _______________________________________________
> >
>

-- Kim Klakow

Diplom Grafik Designer Akimbo71@gmx.net +49172-1786481 Berlin - Germany

Telefonieren Sie schon oder sparen Sie noch?
NEU: GMX Phone_Flat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/telefonie