Re: [CR]Re: Fork taping. Why??

(Example: Production Builders:LeJeune)

From: "Scott Peterson" <bobbycorno@bendbroadband.com>
To: <Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <004001c5ea65$a0960570$6400a8c0@Presario>
Subject: Re: [CR]Re: Fork taping. Why??
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 20:39:17 -0800
cc: Mark@bulgier.net

Neill -

Obviously YOU (and Sheldon) have never argued with Mark...

Scott Peterson
Bend, OR


----- Original Message -----
From: Neill Currie
To: Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Cc: Mark@bulgier.net
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 8:24 PM
Subject: [CR]Re: Fork taping. Why??



> Mark impishly wrote:
>
> Oh and Neill, there is no "driveside" on a fork, so you're correct, it
> is on the non-driveside, or rather one of the two non-drivesides, in
> this case the left non-driveside. Whatsupwidat indeed.
> -----------
>
> To which Neill replied:
>
> Well, if you Google using this pertinent set of search words: "fork
> drive side bicycle obscure".............
> the very first hit, is a reference to the great Sheldon Brown: "For some
> obscure reason, some writers on bicycle matters seem to have a problem
> ... (This relates to the fact that the chain drive is on the right
> side.) ..."
>
> Now, we all know that nobody argues with Sheldon, so I think you had
> better stop now ;-)
> Whatsupwidat?
>
> Neill Currie
> Hillsborough, Nh, USA.
>
> My blog, bike related, I think, is at
> http://blogericious.blogspot.com/
>
> The Mountain Goat bicycle website is located here:
> http://www.geocities.com/neill1234/index.html?1011568933040