Re: [CR] Re: Titan bars and stems continued

(Example: Events:BVVW)

Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:36:51 -0500
From: <joebz@optonline.net>
Subject: Re: [CR] Re: Titan bars and stems continued
In-reply-to: <6bbc839b61586c771863dec58e81d174@htc.net>
To: Ken Wehrenberg <wnwires@htc.net>
References: <6bbc839b61586c771863dec58e81d174@htc.net>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

Or maybe close to the demise of the company? Anyone know? I love the aluminium binder bolts that bend, but don't seem to break. Aluminium bolt on a steel stem- wierd.

Joe Bender-Zanoni
Great Notch, NJ


----- Original Message -----
From: Ken Wehrenberg
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:09:00 -0000
Subject: [CR] Re: Titan bars and stems continued


> Peter said that the "Luxe" stem was the better model as the name

\r?\n> would

\r?\n> suggest. I agree, however, I have a bar and stem combo from an old

\r?\n> Crescent (the bars are perhaps the most ergonomic flat bars I have

\r?\n> ever

\r?\n> used) and the bar-holding portion of the stem was welded in such

\r?\n> that

\r?\n> it is not 100% horizontal and my handlebars are higher on the left!

\r?\n>

\r?\n> It's not just a little bit either and is more noticeable on these

\r?\n> wider

\r?\n> bars! Nice engraving: M Kint, A Schotte, S Maes, V Steenbergen.

\r?\n> Year

\r?\n> of manufacture is '71. Chalk it up to lesser quality control at

\r?\n> the

\r?\n> height of the boom.

\r?\n>

\r?\n> Ken Wehrenberg,

\r?\n> Hermann, MO