Re: [CR]Fixed cups, why assemble so tight??

(Example: Events:Cirque du Cyclisme:2004)

Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 18:30:23 -0800
From: "Kurt Sperry" <haxixe@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Fixed cups, why assemble so tight??
Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
In-Reply-To: <20051208203047.62477.qmail@web81003.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <009501c5fc22$0cc7b770$6400a8c0@Presario>


FWIW I've installed a few fixed cups into frames, both left and righthanded threads only snug- perhaps 20 ft-lbs of torque- and never had one loosen. Of course I don't believe in tightening pedals into crankarms really tight either... Some grease or better anti-seize compound on the threads will also facilitate later removal. I might have just been lucky so far though too I'll grant.

Kurt Sperry Bellingham WA

On 12/8/05, Jerome & Elizabeth Moos <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> Theoretically, French and Italian cups shown have to be well tightened, a s
> (in theory) they should loosen in use. In fact, most of the most
> difficult-to-remove fixed cups I have encountered have been French, and
> therefore RH thread. So much for theory. The fact that French and Itali an
> cups are still often very difficult to remove suggests that maybe the
> tendency of BB cups to work loose is greatly exaggerated and that lockrin gs
> on both sides could in fact usually be adequate. Ceratinly all sorts of
> sealed/cartridge BB's over the years have used lockrings or mounting ring s
> on both sides, although some like Phil Wood reccomend use of Locktite on
the

> rings.

>

> --

> fineartscrimshaw.com