Re: [CR]re: Peugeot ID help needed

(Example: Component Manufacturers:Cinelli)

From: "Pete Geurds" <raleighpro@dejazzd.com>
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <20050308172523.48324.qmail@web30602.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]re: Peugeot ID help needed
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:32:40 -0500
reply-type=original

From: "Fred Rafael Rednor" <fred_rednor@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [CR]re: Peugeot ID help needed


> One thing that really distinguished the "better" semi-PX10
> frames from their slightly less desirable sisters is the fork.
> If you take a look at the trailing edges of the fork blades,
> the seam will be really obvious on the less expensive forks.
> Some of the semi-PX10s actually used Reynolds fork blades, so I
> imagine that those had no visible seams even if it's a latter
> fork made from 501.

I'm confused............ A semi PX-10? I thought a PX10 would have a decent fork.

I scrounged an old AO or UO something or other and it had a seam in the fork you could slip a piece of paper into! Maybe it was damaged, don't know. (It made a satisfying clank when it hit bottom of dumpster)

Pete Geurds
Douglassville, Pa