I'd like to hear again what peoples thoughts are on this subject. I think it varies between the vintage and modern riders.
It is a known fact that people 'shrink' a bit as they age. This could account for it. I also think that as the knees (and other things) age, it becomes more comfortable, and more confidence inspiring on a slightly smaller bike.
-----Original Message----- From: classicrendezvous-bounces@bikelist.org [mailto:classicrendezvous-bounces@bikelist.org]On Behalf Of Michael Francis Butler Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 3:36 PM To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org Subject: [CR] Frame Size & Saddle Height
I know this is an old chestnut but what do other members think is the
appropriate frame size for inside leg measurements. Do you subtract 9.5"
from the inside leg measurement to get the correct frame size. Also when
setting the correct saddle height do you place the heels on the pedals
and pedal backwards without rocking in the saddle. Some people I know
measure their inside leg and multiply by a number, I think its 1.08 to
get the measurement to set the saddle height.
I would be very interested to know especially as there are many frame
builders on the list.
Finally I was always advised to ride a 22.5" or 23" frame but nowadays I
ride a 22" or 21.5" and I feel a lot happier. Is this old age stoop
setting in.
Michael B Huntingdonshire UK
--
Michael Francis Butler
michaelbutler@fastmail.fm