The 62 cm could be it.
Rob Dayton
Charlotte NC
> I'm 6'3", weigh 175-180 and ride a 62cm (c-c) frame, which could
\r?\n> be part of
\r?\n> the problem.
\r?\n>
\r?\n> SP
\r?\n> ----- Original Message -----
\r?\n> From: "Robert D. Dayton,Jr." <rdayton@carolina.rr.com>
\r?\n> To: "'Scott Peterson'" <bobbycorno@bendbroadband.com>;
\r?\n> <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
\r?\n> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 10:08 PM
\r?\n> Subject: RE: [CR]Too much frame flex
\r?\n>
\r?\n>
\r?\n> > Wow Scott.
\r?\n> > How much do you weigh?
\r?\n> > Just curious.
\r?\n> > Rob Dayton
\r?\n> > Charlotte NC
\r?\n> >
\r?\n> > -----Original Message-----
\r?\n> > From: classicrendezvous-bounces@bikelist.org
\r?\n> > [mailto:classicrendezvous-bounces@bikelist.org] On Behalf Of Scott
\r?\n> Peterson
\r?\n> > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 1:07 PM
\r?\n> > To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
\r?\n> > Subject: Re: [CR]Too much frame flex
\r?\n> >
\r?\n> > Never crashed because of it, but the only bike I've ever ridden that
\r?\n> > actually scared me was a victim of excessive torsional flex. Going
\r?\n> downhill
\r?\n> > at speed, the rear end would flex so much every time I hit a
\r?\n> bump that the
\r?\n> > bike would literally change directions. Not a comfortable
\r?\n> sensation,> especially at 40+ mph... This was a titanium frame
\r?\n> from a very well
\r?\n> > regarded name (E___ M_____ Ti AX, built by L_______). Soured me
\r?\n> on Ti
\r?\n> > frames for good.
\r?\n> >
\r?\n> > Scott Peterson
\r?\n> > Bend, OR
\r?\n> >
\r?\n> > ps - no, it wasn't wheel flex: my light steel bike w/the same
\r?\n> wheels has
\r?\n> no
\r?\n> > such problems. Nor was it fork flex, since I was running a
\r?\n> Columbus Max
\r?\n> > steel fork, and the problem occurred only when the rear wheel
\r?\n> hit a bump.
\r?\n> > ----- Original Message -----
\r?\n> > From: "Mazzeo, Daniel" <Daniel.Mazzeo@usap.gov>
\r?\n> > To: "charles nighbor" <cnighbor@pacbell.net>;
\r?\n> > <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
\r?\n> > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 9:41 AM
\r?\n> > Subject: RE: [CR]Too much frame flex
\r?\n> >
\r?\n> >
\r?\n> > > Worst crash/fall I ever took was the result of frame flex
\r?\n> pulling the
\r?\n> > > rear derailleur cable and sending the chain between cogs while
\r?\n> standing> > on the pedals going uphill full force. I had
\r?\n> religiously made sure my
\r?\n> > > rear shifter was tight enough to prevent this but did not
\r?\n> check it on
\r?\n> > > this particular day. Landed very hard on left hip and turned
\r?\n> black from
\r?\n> > > the ankle to the armpit, smelled like a corpse. It was not
\r?\n> fun. Yes
\r?\n> > > you can have too much frame flex.
\r?\n> > >
\r?\n> > > Dan Mazzeo
\r?\n> > > Morrison, CO
\r?\n> > >
\r?\n> > > -----Original Message-----
\r?\n> > > From: classicrendezvous-bounces@bikelist.org
\r?\n> > > [mailto:classicrendezvous-bounces@bikelist.org] On Behalf Of
\r?\n> charles> > nighbor
\r?\n> > > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 10:19 AM
\r?\n> > > To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
\r?\n> > > Subject: [CR]Too much frame flex
\r?\n> > >
\r?\n> > > There can be too much frame flex. While at a friends house for
\r?\n> dinner I
\r?\n> > > tried to ride his wife women's style ten speed starting at the
\r?\n> bottom of
\r?\n> > > a small but still a hill. I could not get up. I couldn't
\r?\n> believe that
\r?\n> > > has good and strong a rider I was then that with my skill and
\r?\n> strength I
\r?\n> > > couldn't somehow finesse and power my way up. After 10 or so
\r?\n> tries I
\r?\n> > > believed in too much frame flex is not contusive to good
\r?\n> climbing or
\r?\n> > > even climbing a hill.
\r?\n> > > Charles Nighbor
\r?\n> > > Walnut Creek, Ca