RE: [CR]Re: martano washers

(Example: Racing:Beryl Burton)

From: "Ken Freeeman" <freesound@comcast.net>
To: "'Neill Currie'" <neill_currie@comcast.net>, <morgan@hahaha.org>
Subject: RE: [CR]Re: martano washers
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 10:00:39 -0400
In-Reply-To: <002201c5b5b7$1edfe740$6400a8c0@Presario>
Thread-Index: AcW1txxlZ4U0qJLcSYevDzMQnV2PvQAWNSGw
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

I think stainless is probably a better choice anyway, due to lack of rust.

Ken Freeman Ann Arbor, MI

-----Original Message----- From: classicrendezvous-bounces@bikelist.org [mailto:classicrendezvous-bounces@bikelist.org] On Behalf Of Neill Currie Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 11:24 PM To: morgan@hahaha.org Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org Subject: [CR]Re: martano washers

This may help you, it may not.

I went to the hardware store with a MTB rim in hand last week looking for washers that would fit over the nipple shank and be small enough o/d to fit inside the drilling in the inner rim section. Long story, but often I wish to reinforce non-eyeletted MTB rims a little, or simply re-use spokes in a hub-rim combo that the spokes are a mm or so too long for.

Anyway, standard plated steel washers, think they are #6, are the correct i/d, but are too large o/d..........but the exact same #6 washers in stainless were much smaller o/d and fit perfectly ;-) I was a happy camper.

Neill Currie
Hillsborough, Nh.