kohl57@starpower.net wrote:
> I admit I didn't even know what a "KOF" was until I had joined the CR List
> .
> And was too embarassed to ask. I think it's swell there are folks who
> still build bikes the traditional way.
>
> But I am not in the market for them.
>
> Why?
>
> Because I don't quite see the point. A good steel, lugged frame of the
> right size and geometry and build quality is the same if it's built c.
> 1956 or 2006. And an original classic frame from one of the famous builders
> or manufacturers has the added benefit of the history, tradition and ethos
> that comes with it.
You make a good point regarding the historical provenance of a famous builder, but the difference between an historic frame and a custom frame is analogous to that between an "off the peg" suit of clothes and a tailored suit. If the fit and satisfaction of the tailored suit is what turns your crank, then the store-bought suit just won't cut it, no matter who designed it or sewed it.
That said, I'm a casual guy and like you find many production bikes to be perfectly fine. But I can build my own, so that's what I do, and I make 'em my way, and as you say a good steel frame properly cared for should last a lifetime. :-)
--
John "but I can't sew" (john@os2.dhs.org)
Appleton WI USA