[CR]Those Extended head tubes on Rivendells...a slightly different
slant
(Example: History:Norris Lockley)
From: Tom Sanders <tsan7759142@sbcglobal.net>
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 14:16:20 -0500
Thread-Index: AcZLiZpSmhAioEHDSKmQ8ueADVjo5g==
Subject: [CR]Those Extended head tubes on Rivendells...a slightly different
slant
We have just about beaten this tired old horse to death, with some folks
abhorring those extended head tubes and others, like myself, not being
bothered by the look of them and even liking the functionality of them. Joe
Stark presented a link to a very nice bike with an extended head tube
http://rivendellbicycles.com/html/membership_rivendell39.htmlhttp://rivendellbicycles.com/html/membership_rivendell39.html .
I'd like to mention something that hasn't yet been touched upon, I believe.
Those of us who ride smaller bikes often have the esthetic value if the
lugwork around the head tube diminished by the fact that with such a small
head tube there usually isn't enough room for the lugs to develop fully to
please the eye because this space is "cramped". Note how on this bike the
full pattern and flow of the head lugs has been allowed to develop and
imagine how it would have looked if they had been compressed into a normal
head tube length. Hope I am articulating this well enough, It's a tough
thing to explain my thoughts fully, but very small bikes often seem
disproportionate and suffer to my eye by the head tube being too short to
allow the bikes design to be represented fully.
I think this bike does this very nicely.
Tom Sanders
Lansing, Mi