Chuck; This is my only "onlist" response to you. I already gave you my reasoning "offlist" more than once in a few emails for not posting the name of the guilty party, but you do not seem to want to respect or understand my reasoning. I do not ever question your reasoning when you write to the CR, so please respect my wishes and drop the subject. This is my last request.
Peter Naiman Glendale, WI
Chuck Schmidt <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net> wrote:
Peter Naiman wrote:
> Just a clarification of a prior email Sadiq sent to me through the
> list earlier with reference to Jack Gabus. When Sadiq referred to
> Jack it was his attempt at sarcasm or humor, but a few members have
> written wondering what Sadiq was referring to. I wrote Sadiq
> looking for a clarification, understanding he was possibly throwing
> some humor in this morning.
>
> Sadiq: Sorry but I thought a clarificaton was neccesary !!
>
> Unfortunately humor on email doesn't always translate the way one
> intends, as we all may interpret the written word differently.
My impression was that Sadiq was pointing out, in a very humorous way, the absurdity of "outing" someone without including their name.
Chuck Schmidt South Pasadena, Southern California
.