On Jun 16, 2006, at 7:27 PM, oroboyz@aol.com wrote:
> OK, you two. Go straight to your rooms. No dessert, no play time,
> because you are mischievious little boys.
>
> Really, you nerds pushed it too far. Neither will say uncle I guess.
>
> Of course, Chuck was right in his point... Why "out" someone if you
> withhold his name? That isn't outing at all but just repeating a
> nasty letter anonymously!! Many newbies or peripheral folks will
> not know, as we do, that is was Ken Denny. The point of "outing" is
> to embarrass him and make him known as a shit to everyone.
>
> But, as usual, Chuck was not forthright and didn't write, off list,
> to Peter saying "Hey Peter, tell everyone his name so they will
> know he's a shit. The way you did it doesn't help achieve the goal!"
>
> Anyway, nuff out of you doodahs, I am tired and don't want to mess
> with this stuff.....
>
> Dale Brown
Actually you are wrong, Dale. I wrote a few posts "off list" this morning to Peter explaining your original post about outing and why outing requires naming names not just quoting the crap.
And my posts to Peter were also "cc" to you Dale (guess you didn't bother reading them?).
Sigh...
Chuck "extremely forthright damn it" Schmidt South Pasadena, Southern California
.