Re: [CR]Curved crank sets...Why

(Example: Framebuilders:Cecil Behringer)

Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 22:30:13 -0700
From: "Kurt Sperry" <haxixe@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Curved crank sets...Why
Cc: "Classic Rendezvous" <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060630222740.30133.qmail@web52508.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <75d04b480606300846v7f4314d5qd549ce5632f9909c@mail.gmail.com>


Don, it's essentially aesthetics either way. My eye is offended by designs that obviously use more metal than is necessary on classic lightweights.

I'm pretty sure those cranks work just as well as a conventional contemporary pair. There's probably even contemporary straight cranks that weigh more.

Kurt Sperry Bellingham WA

On 6/30/06, Don Wilson <dcwilson3@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Kurt, I believe it was Friar Sheldon who quoted the
> exquisitely "miserable" Hugo, or another French
> luminary saying: "A beautiful thing is as useful as a
> useful thing." Please do not deny me ma petit belle
> epoch containing these curved cranks. ;-)
> Don Wilson
> Los Olivos, CA USA

>

> --

> fineartscrimshaw.com