RE: [CR]Was 753, now is energy recovered constructively?

(Example: Events:Eroica)

From: "Jon Schaer" <jschaer@columbus.rr.com>
To: "CR" <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>, <jgallen@lexairinc.com>
Subject: RE: [CR]Was 753, now is energy recovered constructively?
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:40:10 -0400


>>>The 753 bikes I own (all Raleigh Teams) display their flexibility most dramatically during hard braking on descents. You can see the forks deflect what seem a couple of inches.>>>

I don't believe there was ever a "753" fork blade. To make it thin enough to have any worthwhile weight savings, there supposedly would have been problems bending the heat-treated material. The blades should be 531, though I wonder if those team bikes would have used lighter tubes than standard forks. I have a KOF 1993 Waterford 753 (65cm!) that is one of the best descending bikes I have, and I don't consider the fork particularly different than other comparable steel frame/forks in the stable. I also have a KOF Landshark that is 653 OS, and those blades (straight, though) are also 531.

Jon Schaer
Columbus, OH