Re: [CR]32H vs 36H and plug

(Example: Production Builders:Frejus)

From: "ternst" <ternst1@cox.net>
To: <WesOishi@aol.com>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <335.6cfef080.3204e587@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]32H vs 36H and plug
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 12:26:02 -0700
reply-type=original

I think when the metallurgy on rims got better, including the profile. This made the wheel "stronger" so that 32 equalled 36 in new equipment and enjoys 4 spokes less turbulence. Weight may be a wash on alloy rims but with the new ugh off list unmentionables spoke count went down to 16/18/20 + depending. For our timeline purposes however, I think my first comments are pretty
close to the mark.
Ted Ernst
Palos Verdes Estates
CA USA


----- Original Message -----
From: WesOishi@aol.com
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 11:01 AM
Subject: [CR]32H vs 36H and plug



> When did the "standard" change from 36H to 32H? And beyond that question,
> why?
>
> My precious "Masi water bottle" is up on eBay. I don't have my Carlsbad
> Masi
> anymore, so I figured I'd let the water bottle go.
>
> Wes Oishi
> Los Angeles (via Como St and Skypark Circle)