Re: [CR]Richard Burke & Trek's origins

(Example: Framebuilders:Doug Fattic)

Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:23:18 -0500
From: "John Thompson" <JohnThompson@new.rr.com>
Organization: The Crimson Permanent Assurance
To: dddd <dddd@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]Richard Burke & Trek's origins
References: <DB138660B6B01D458B16F9205C0C2634021CA11F@ISOEMAILP3.iso.com> <001601c6bbea$febf7760$4001a8c0@compaq>
In-Reply-To: <001601c6bbea$febf7760$4001a8c0@compaq>
cc: Classic Rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>

dddd wrote:
>> Here, Burke reveals how he built the bicycle giant:
>>
>> ".....In 1984 we made some bad product...... "
>
> Haunting statement, ouch.
>
> Does anyone know what implications this statement entails for owners of,
> say, bikes like my 1984 Trek 720?

I think the bad product referred to are the models Trek machine-brazed at that time. (400, 500, and 600 series). These had one-piece investment cast head tubes (weighed a ton!), seat lugs, bottom brackets, and dropouts. The castings were designed with ease of construction in mind -- none of the tubes were mitered but rather straight-cut and fit against cast-in shoulders inside the lugs. They were not brazed with torches but using electromagnetic induction and automatic wire feeds for the brass. I remember a lot of time and effort spent on this, with less than satisfactory results.

The 700 and higher series (including 720s) were traditionally lugged, mitered and torch-brazed frames. Your bike is a "keeper" IMHO. :-)

--
John (john@os2.dhs.org)
Appleton WI USA