Re: [CR]26.8mm seatposts

(Example: Framebuilding:Norris Lockley)

Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Fred Rafael Rednor" <fred_rednor@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]26.8mm seatposts
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
In-Reply-To: <20060818012134.62923.qmail@web32909.mail.mud.yahoo.com>


Of course, this is where it gets complicated. For a French or Swiss frame, 26.8 would be a large diameter seat post. In those cases 26.4 or 26.8 would be the norm, and the OD of the seat tube would be 28mm vs. 28.6mm.

Then again, I don't know whether Columbus made tubes in French dimensions, as did Reynolds. But it's possible that the French and Swiss builders used 26.8mm seatposts on SLX frames just for the sake of consistency. You'll have to measure to be sure...
     Fred Rednor - Arlington, Virginia (USA)


--- John Quigley wrote:


> My late 1980's Concorde is made Columbus SLX tubing and it
> also uses a 26.8, I wish it was a 27.2 (:
>
>
> KvnMuadib@aol.com wrote:
> my 80's peugeot is made with columbus slx tubing throughout
> and it takes a
> 26.8 seat tube.though 27.2 is more often than not the
> seatpost size for a
> lot of columbus tubesets .apparently there are exceptions.
> maybe because the
> frame is 61 c-t and intended for a larger heavier rider?
> maybe the french just
> like to be different? i,m no expert either.anyways..
> kevin"heres my two cents
> worth" ruberg howell nj usa ps. vive le difference! or is it
> la?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> John A. Quigley
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>

__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com