Re: [CR]172.5 cranks on 21" 1969 Raleigh Pro

(Example: Component Manufacturers:Campagnolo)

From: "Eric Elman" <tr4play@cox.net>
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <20060924195157.997.qmail@web82211.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]172.5 cranks on 21" 1969 Raleigh Pro
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:18:27 -0400
reply-type=original

Jerry,
>From my experience, the 172.5's are typical. I've seen about 8 or 10 early Pro's and all had 172.5's. My experience has been that around 1972/73ish they went to 170.0 as the standard. Maybe of interest too is that the early Team Pro's from Ilkeston specialty shop seem to have come with undated 172.5's - at least on the 5 that I've seen in person including my own 1974 SB19.

Eric Elman cathing up on A few weeks worth of CR postings Somers, CT USA


----- Original Message -----
From: Jerome & Elizabeth Moos
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2006 3:51 PM
Subject: [CR]172.5 cranks on 21" 1969 Raleigh Pro



> Reassembling the 1969/1970 Raleigh Pro I recently bought on eBay after
> treating with Weigle's Framesaver, washing and many coats of wax. I note
> that the undated Campy NR cranks are 172.5, even though this is only a 21"
> frame, measures 53 cm ctc. It seems odd to see 172.5 cranks on a frame
> this small. The undated cranks are of course correct for 1969/1970 and
> there is no other indication the cranks are not original. Plus if the
> cranks were replaced, it is likely this occured soon after purchase, since
> 172.5 is a moderately unusual length, and finding an undated 172.5 would
> have been a little difficult many years later.
>
> Anyone remember these bikes coming with 172.5, even in smaller frame
> sizes? Any guesses if this could in fact be original?
>
> Regards,
>
> Jerry Moos
> Big Spring, Republica de Tejas