[CR]Fwd: [T@H] was Pedals now lugged forks?

(Example: Framebuilders:Cecil Behringer)

Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:34:29 -0700
From: "Mitch Harris" <mitch.harris@gmail.com>
To: Classic Rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
In-Reply-To: <004601c61b79$a36d9b60$b33cd945@domainnotset.invalid>
References: <004601c61b79$a36d9b60$b33cd945@domainnotset.invalid>
Subject: [CR]Fwd: [T@H] was Pedals now lugged forks?

This is how the history of lugged bicycles is being told on the Tandem@Hobbslist. Strange.

Mitch Harris Little Rock Canyon, Utah

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Arlyn @ Superior Tandems <arlyn@superiortandems.com> Date: Jan 17, 2006 7:25 AM Subject: [T@H] was Pedals now lugged forks? To: Multiple recipients of list <tandem@hobbes.ucsd.edu>

Folks,

Someone pointed out to me that not everyone knows what a lugged steel = fork is and why they frequently fail. These went out of popularity in the = 80's because of there terrible rate of failure. These are brazed steel = forks that the crown is a lug and the steel fork blades were brazed into it. = The rate of failure of the blades at the lug after XYZ number of stress = cycles was pretty much 100% because of the flex on the blades were they entered = the lug. Maybe some of you engineer types care to elaborate?

Jobst Brandt does a better job of describing it at

http://yarchive.net/bike/fork_failures.html

Arlyn Aronson @ Superior Tandems (906) 370-2911 Quality tandems and accessories.

=20


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arlyn @ Superior Tandems [mailto:arlyn@superiortandems.com]
> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 8:55 PM
> To: 'Multiple recipients of list'
> Subject: was Pedals now Merck?
>=20
> Eddy also rode on tubular's, no helmet, on a steel crowned fork.
> The world moves forward.
>=20
> Arlyn Aronson @ Superior Tandems (906) 370-2911
> Quality tandems and accessories.