[CR]Re: Quick-Glo tied-up in divorce poceedings

(Example: Framebuilders:Jack Taylor)

From: "Aldo Ross" <aldoross4@siscom.net>
To: <jvs@sonic.net>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>, <oroboyz@aol.com>
References: <MONKEYFOODX22zxHpGh0000307f@monkeyfood.nt.phred.org> <454CC42D.3010105@sonic.net> <8C8CEA7BF105AD0-4C8-68D4@webmail-da15.sysops.aol.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 23:28:04 -0500
reply-type=original
Subject: [CR]Re: Quick-Glo tied-up in divorce poceedings

I remember a discussion somewhere about the rights to produce Quick-Glo being tied-up in divorce proceedings... I searched the CR archives, but didn't find any other info. Is it perhaps something we talked about at Cirque?

Aldo Ross
Middletown, Ohio, USA


----- Original Message -----
From: oroboyz@aol.com
To: jvs@sonic.net
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 11:12 PM
Subject: [CR]Now: Quick Glo



> << A better alternative (I think, anyway) is a product called Quick Glo.
> It's a non toxic paste that lifts rust. I have used it on very rusty
> chromed rims and cranks and the results are astounding>>
>
> Sad to report but QuickGlo is no longer produced! (strange but true...)
> Dale Brown