Re: [CR] The two approaches to racing...not so simple! Re: 1960's Racing Moultons

(Example: Racing:Jean Robic)

In-Reply-To: <v04210106c19016b34384@[192.168.0.2]>
References: <MONKEYFOODBROH4TKbm000017e7@monkeyfood.nt.phred.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:56:56 -0500
To: Jeff Potter <jeff@outyourbackdoor.com>, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
From: "Sheldon Brown" <CaptBike@sheldonbrown.com>
Subject: Re: [CR] The two approaches to racing...not so simple! Re: 1960's Racing Moultons


I generalized:
>>There's a fundamental philosophical question of "what is the purpose
>>of racing."
>>
>>One answer is that is a way to improve the technology.
>>
>>Another answer is that it is to compare the skill and strength of athletes.

Jeff Potter commented:
>I don't think it's as black'n'white as that. The two answers blur
>even with the UCI, of course. The UCI likes to boost tech if it
>doesn't give unfair advantage.

I never meant to imply that it was an all-or-nothing situation, because both approaches always coexist.

It is more an issue of emphasis and priority. The governing bodies have their "ideals" but the actual racers look for every edge they can get, because to a racer, winning is the only objective.

Sheldon "A Techie, Not An Athlete" Brown +--------------------------------------------------------------+ | No state has an inherent right to survive through | | conscript troops and, in the long run, no state ever has. | | --Robert A. Heinlein | +--------------------------------------------------------------+ --
    Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts
       Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041
            http://harriscyclery.com
       Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide
            http://captainbike.com
    Useful articles about bicycles and cycling
            http://sheldonbrown.com