Re: [CR] was, Dimpled, now Why are concaves execrable?

(Example: Framebuilders:Tony Beek)

In-Reply-To: <455500A7.3080805@optonline.net>
References: <20061110222215.44286.qmail@web82206.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:05:12 -0500
To: Joseph Bender-Zanoni <joebz@optonline.net>, Jerome & Elizabeth Moos <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>
From: "Sheldon Brown" <CaptBike@sheldonbrown.com>
Subject: Re: [CR] was, Dimpled, now Why are concaves execrable?
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

Joseph Bender-Zanoni wrote:
>I'll chime in with some guesses why Sheldon declares these
>"exacrable". The first is that they are heavy. If you want a heavy
>strong rim, use a Mod. 58. The second is that for all the weight,
>the alloy is a bit soft and they are not all that strong. No
>eyelets. Difficult to seat tires and potential to blow off tires
>because of concave inner surface causing rim strip to interfere with
>tire bead . A very inelegant rim in my opinion.

Right. In addition, they're anti-aerodynamic, accumulate dirt, and my favorite spoke wrench won't work with them.

Sheldon "Aside From That, How Did You Like The Play, Mrs. Lincoln?" Brown +-------------------------------------------+ | If we had no faults, we would not take so | | much pleasure in noticing them in others. | | - Francois, Duc de la Rouchefoucauld | +-------------------------------------------+ --
    Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts
       Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041
            http://harriscyclery.com
       Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide
            http://captainbike.com
    Useful articles about bicycles and cycling
            http://sheldonbrown.com