Re: [CR]Lopsided Brooks Saddle--Bicycle Quarterly

(Example: Framebuilding:Norris Lockley)

In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20061208183450.008784b0@mailhost.oxford.net>
References: <8C8E9200500ADDE-560-A3BC@mblk-d36.sysops.aol.com> <BAY122-F96B7E86CA248832BE0988F5D30@phx.gbl> <C19EEDF8.1B94%mdschmidt@patmedia.net> <75d04b480612081110g76219396u549b467e74db703b@mail.gmail.com>
From: <masirider@mac.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Lopsided Brooks Saddle--Bicycle Quarterly
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 16:19:23 -0800
To: John Betmanis <johnb@oxford.net>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

The one and only Brooks Pro I've ever owned (from a '74 or '75 Motobecane) became lopsided and I rode it that way for years. I never could tell it was lopsided when riding - maybe I was the lopsided one.

Drew Ellison Everett, WA USA

On Dec 8, 2006, at 3:34 PM, John Betmanis wrote:
> At 10:10 PM 12/8/06 +0000, joebz@optonline.net wrote:
>> Lopsidedness is very common in Brooks saddles. I would guess at
>> least one
> out of ten. The butt leather can usually be seen to be thicker on
> one side
> than the other although some times it just seems to be stretchier
> (probably
> less dense). In use the thinner or stretchier side sags more.
>
> Could it be that today's more efficient manufacturing methods get the
> maximum number of saddles out of each hide, thus ending up with these
> inconsistencies? Also, no human body is perfectly symetrical, so the
> lopsidedness can come from the rider.
>
> John Betmanis
> Woodstock, Ontario
> Canada