[CR]Thoughts on drilling track forks

(Example: Framebuilding:Technology)

From: "Ben Sanford" <B.Sanford@cox.net>
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:34:41 -0500
thread-index: AcchSTrxMyfzqTtDT0SgUtxjj84f2w==
Subject: [CR]Thoughts on drilling track forks

I was on my first ride in almost two months on my \u201973 Eisentraut track bike (fork un-drilled \u2013 using a replacement fork). If you are thinking about drilling a track bike fork - there is a safety issue involved as well as the significant alteration to what was an original bike.

I have personal experience with the safety issue. I believe that in some many cases track bike forks were designed for their intended usage, which didn\u2019t involve strong rearward forces that could be involved with the use of a front brake. Fork blades are often round rather than oval and the crown may be lighter. I am still recovering from a biking injury caused by a fork failure on a ~\u201995 Waterford lugged steel track bike. This was factory drilled, but apparently, the fork wasn\u2019t strong enough for braking stresses, and bent at the crown when I was breaking, impacted the downtube, and stopping the bike very abruptly.

So thing about not only the cosmetic issue, but also about the potential safety issue when thinking about drilling a track bike fork. Obviously some non-drilled forks are strong enough to be drilled and used with a brake, but I know from personal experience that there are others that aren\u2019t.

Ben Sanford

Falls Church, VA

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.21/589 - Release Date:
12/15/2006
5:10 PM