[CR]Curved Tube Paramounts

(Example: Framebuilding:Tubing:Falck)

Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:58:41 -0400
From: <joebz@optonline.net>
In-reply-to: <20060419165504.61150.qmail@web82206.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
To: Jerome & Elizabeth Moos <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>
References: <001101c663c8$f7a36f10$4349ff44@ts>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: [CR]Curved Tube Paramounts

The picture is bad but the bike looks right. Anything was possible when many Schwinn shops sold a Paramount. The touring freewheel and rear derailleur don't seem right either on a supposed racing model but I guess the guy wanted a 70's version of a top price comfort bike. I learned to check Paramounts very carefully because unlike many other top of the line bikes, they could be assembled by the ham handed Varsity guys. I once had to change out almost every bearing and race on a bike with only a 100 miles on it at most. The initial mechanic must have figured a bearing wasn't right that felt that smooth and tightened all those suckers up.

Joe Bender-Zanoni
Great Notch, NJ


----- Original Message -----
From: Jerome & Elizabeth Moos
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:55:00 -0000
Subject: Re: [CR]More unorthodox frames on E-Bay.


> Am I the only one who questions the authenticity of this bike?

\r?\n> Very poor choice of components for a Paramount, especially the

\r?\n> cheap saddle and the brakes with suicide levers. And based on the

\r?\n> headtube, the frame looks much larger than 48cm unless it has 24"

\r?\n> wheels. And only one very bad picture. I actually like the curved

\r?\n> tube Paramounts, but not this one, especially not at $1000

\r?\n> starting price.

\r?\n>

\r?\n> Regards,

\r?\n>

\r?\n> Jerry Moos

\r?\n> Big Spring, TX

\r?\n>

\r?\n> Tom Sanders <tsan7759142@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

\r?\n> You Paramount folks noted this curved seat tube Paramount? Now

\r?\n> this is one

\r?\n> ugly little rascal! Item # 7235484191

\r?\n> Tom Sanders

\r?\n> Lansing, Mi