Re: [CR]Resolved, was RE: Calling Bill Roberts

(Example: Books:Ron Kitching)

Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 21:02:48 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
From: "rocketman531" <rocketman531@earthlink.net>
To: rhawks@lmi.net, classics rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: Re: [CR]Resolved, was RE: Calling Bill Roberts


Rob Hawks reported that his own problem transaction with Bill Roberts had been resolved, but such is not the case for me. I still have a check stamped "Insufficient Funds" pinned above my screen as a silent reminder. I lose the decals and I lose the funds my bank charged me for returning Bill Roberts' bogus check. Still no reply to my message asking him to send payment. A simple message stating his intention would go a long way. 5 months and counting....

So, Bill. Need more time to resolve things? All you gotta do is say so.

Pat Moffat Tempe, AZ Still looking on the sunny side..

-----Original Message-----

>From: rhawks@lmi.net

>Sent: Apr 3, 2006 10:09 AM

>To: classics rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>

>Subject: [CR]Resolved, was RE: Calling Bill Roberts

>

>

>Others have commented on problem transactions

>with Bill Roberts. I am happy to say that my own

>problem transaction with Bill Roberts has been resolved.

>After enough time had passed that one would otherwise

>think the transaction was lost, Bill Roberts made good

>and covered the expenses incurred by the previously bad

>payment. While no one would term the whole of this

>experience as a good transaction, I thought it worth

>noting that Bill did, after some time, uphold his end

>of the transaction. I've heard from others that initially

>it looked like buyers and sellers got stiffed, but much

>later parts arrived or payments came. I really don't

>know the full story, and remain skeptical about some

>explanations, but I think Bill Roberts got into a hole,

>and over time is now getting himself out of it. Good for

>him for trying and better still if he achieves it.

>

>rob hawks

>richmond, ca