RE: [CR]Judging Stuff

(Example: Framebuilding:Technology)

From: "David Toppin" <dave@pelletizer.com>
To: "'John Waner'" <x76911s@socal.rr.com>
Subject: RE: [CR]Judging Stuff
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:26:53 -0400
Thread-Index: AcaPwmzkSukSQ/OJRsezaJgUxjfahwABFx3Q
In-Reply-To: <2c4e9a2aa9dfb4261fb0444f098ef846@socal.rr.com>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

I don't think anyone is trying to deliberately misrepresent others comments, it's probably just how they read what was written!

David Toppin dave@pelletizer.com http://www.pelletizer.com <see our complete, searchable inventory

The Pelletizer Group, Inc. 4 LaChance Street Gardner, MA 01440-2476

(978) 669-0060 (978) 669-0061 fax

-----Original Message----- From: classicrendezvous-bounces@bikelist.org [mailto:classicrendezvous-bounces@bikelist.org] On Behalf Of John Waner Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 10:54 AM To: CR List Subject: [CR]Judging Stuff

I agree 100%, not that there is anything wrong with having a discussion about judging and our differing opinions. The dominance of this topic gives the incorrect impression that the Crique ended on a sour note. At this point it is starting to get divisive with people misinterpreting others comments. It seems to me that we should remember that this was all instigated by an unsolicited nasty comment by a non-member who in his own words considers us "all a bunch of losers". At this point I think we are playing right into his petty little game. All this person seems to want is to cause dissension, I certainly would not want to let him push my buttons! John Waner Huntington Beach, CA.