Re: [CR]26" x 1-1/4" rim size clarification (I think)

(Example: Framebuilders:Bernard Carré)

From: "ternst" <ternst1@cox.net>
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>, "Philip Easton" <sybaspex@tcsn.net>
References: <6.1.2.0.2.20060712195118.0d898008@inmail.tcsn.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]26" x 1-1/4" rim size clarification (I think)
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 21:18:17 -0700
reply-type=response

Thanks, Phil. Hopefully you'll get just what you need. They may be a little hard to find. In the late '40's we had the nice Dunlop 26x1-1/4's high pressures especially put on the custom made small Urago machines we brought in when we were still in Chicago. They were the nifty alloy rims and rode like a million for the smaller sport/touring riders that couldn't quite stretch properly onto the 27" wheels and frame sizes bigger people could reach. I don't remember whether we had 165 or stayed with 170 hollow octagonal Duprat cranks , but in the Midwest it wasn't too hilly and the shorter crank was no handicap gear ratiowise. Maybe someone will have a more recent rim like that and you would be in fat
city.
Ted Ernst
Palos Verdes Estates, Ca


----- Original Message -----
From: Philip Easton
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 7:57 PM
Subject: [CR]26" x 1-1/4" rim size clarification (I think)



> Hi All, Thank you Sheldon and Ted for pointing out a conflict in my
> request for 26" Dunlop rims. What I was trying to say was that the ones I
> want are stamped "Dunlop Special Lightweight", with no mention of EA1 on
> them. The Dunlop rims stamped EA1 are the standard wider rims that they
> made from at least the early twenties, and probably before. My
> understanding is that the Dunlop Special Lightweight rims were introduced
> in 1935 for use with their high pressure tires that were introduced at the
> same time, and which where similar in appearance and size to tubular tire.
> The ones I am looking for are a the narrow ones stamped "Special
> Lightweight" with no mention of EA1. Sorry for the confusion. Thanks
> again, Phil Easton