Re: [CR]Re: WTB: Schwinn Super Sport, Sports Tourer or Superior frame set

(Example: Humor)

Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:14:13 +0000 (GMT)
From: <joebz@optonline.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]Re: WTB: Schwinn Super Sport, Sports Tourer or Superior frame set
In-reply-to: <954702dd0704251031x206f82fdraa39a6d9eca22ba8@mail.gmail.com>
To: Doug Van Cleve <dvancleve@gmail.com>
References: <954702dd0704241443g889ad6eycb6a63338574f62@mail.gmail.com>
cc: Classic Rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>

The measurement is to the actual top of the top tube, which has extra length for a collar. If you can ride a 57cm c-c, the 24" should be OK.

The days of finding Sports Tourers at garage sales seem to over. The Superior (of that type) was only made for one year. It has Suntour derailleurs, a Nervar crank and no built in kickstand. I would stay clear of the Ashtabula crank Super Sport. There are decent BMX conversion BBs though if you want to go cotterless.

Joe Bender-Zanoni
Great Notch, NJ


----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Van Cleve"
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:31:00 -0000
Subject: [CR]Re: WTB: Schwinn Super Sport, Sports Tourer or Superior frame set
To: "Classic Rendezvous"


> Folks,

\r?\n>

\r?\n> Based on pictures of a 22" these measure out small. Can anybody

\r?\n> get a

\r?\n> C-T of top tube height and actual C-C top tube length on a 22" model?

\r?\n> Standover would also be helpful to know. I can't imagine

\r?\n> anything 24"

\r?\n> not being too big for me, but the 22" looks small. Thanks again :^)

\r?\n>

\r?\n> Doug Van Cleve

\r?\n> Chandler, AZ USA

\r?\n>

\r?\n>

\r?\n> On 4/24/07, Doug Van Cleve wrote:

\r?\n> > Howdy folks,

\r?\n> >

\r?\n> > I would like to find a nice but not too nice one of these in about

\r?\n> > 55cm. It looks like they had a 22" model, so that would

\r?\n> probably be

\r?\n> > it. Anybody have one that you would sell?

\r?\n> >

\r?\n> > Doug Van Cleve

\r?\n> > Chandler, AZ USA