Re: [CR]Odd Mavic headset at a well-known auction site

(Example: Component Manufacturers:Ideale)

Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 10:59:07 -0700
From: "Kurt Sperry" <haxixe@gmail.com>
To: "Chuck Schmidt" <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]Odd Mavic headset at a well-known auction site
In-Reply-To: <D5B94EE4-EAC0-48EE-A39A-6B208799BFE9@earthlink.net>
References: <15919.38618.qm@web55912.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <431E778FEFC2314EB278EF695B285B7E1BE045@MLS3WN01P.WAS.INT.IMF.ORG>
cc: Classic Rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>

On 5/1/07, Chuck Schmidt <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> I'd guess early Mavic headset, but not prototype. I say this because
> I have one just like it still in its Mavic box, and there were a
> couple of more just like it at the store I got it from back in the
> late 1970s (Marina del Rey bike shop here in Southern California).
>
> The lack of steel races looked like too much hubris on the part of
> Mavic (from JPR design?) and soon after (?) they incorporated steel
> races into the headset. Sometimes lightness isn't the King but turns
> out to be only the Joker.
>
> Chuck Schmidt
> South Pasadena, CA
>
> I doubt weight consciousness would be the motivator that caused someone to
> attempt to pass off aluminum races for steel bearings. Hubris or an
> unfamiliarity with bearing tribology seem more likely. A DLC-type treatment
> might help, but coatings however hard applied to soft substrates like Al
> combined with point loadings like ball bearings entail seem destined to
> premature failure.

Kurt Sperry
Bellingham WA
USA