[CR]The vagaries of those "Second Tier" bicycles and problems with broad schemes of classification...

(Example: Production Builders:Peugeot:PX-10LE)

From: Tom Sanders <tsan7759142@sbcglobal.net>
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 09:51:42 -0400
Thread-Index: AceW+CtCA7dVZZgLSfO2Y0NWrhSjqQ==
Subject: [CR]The vagaries of those "Second Tier" bicycles and problems with broad schemes of classification...

I suppose it is obvious to a lot of folks that many lines of bikes one mention as Second Tier produced a few really upscale models that easily keep company with those supposed "First Tier" bikes and that even the obvious candidates for First Tier produced some decidedly lower level bikes...Like the Eisentraut Limited, or a Colnago with that accursed stiletto fork that I once owned. Battaglin and Rauler made some bikes that I think are nearly heart stopping. I have owned one such Battaglin and good buddy Mark Poore's blue Rauler is the rival of just about anything on two wheels. The trouble with broad characterizations is that they are so akin to metaphors...they often just don't work. I noted Paramount was included into some folks scheme of First Tier bikes. I love them and collect them, but I had to raise my eyebrows a bit over such a factory made item's inclusion. My own (and probably indefensible) scheme might be to put those one man made bikes first and then lump others behind them, but I make no claim to being unbiased.
Tom Sanders
Lansing, Mi USA