Re: [CR]Frame Geometry and stay length...The angels are dancing on the head of a pin once more...

(Example: Racing)

Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 21:55:19 -0700
From: "Kurt Sperry" <haxixe@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Frame Geometry and stay length...The angels are dancing on the head of a pin once more...
Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
In-Reply-To: <006601c79b52$07c45780$6ef02a41@ts>
References: <006601c79b52$07c45780$6ef02a41@ts>


I'd be rather surprised if there's a rider out there who could reliably feel the difference in ride or handling in an inch change in the real wheel adjustment in a blind test.

Kurt Sperry Bellingham WA USA

On 5/20/07, Tom Sanders <tsan7759142@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> I realize that there are some builders and a few real technophiles (to
> perhaps coin a word) on the list and to them it may well be important to
> know exact and precise stay lengths. For most of us, though, on a built
> up
> bike a quick glance at the relative position of the wheel or tire to the
> seat tube is probably enough to judge whether the bike meets our needs or
> not.
> I realize that with a bare frame this does not work too well. For all
> intents and purposes for a collector like myself, though, this one glance
> method works quite well.
> On a bare frame I pull out my ever present tape measure and go from the
> center of the BB axel to the center of the drop out and this seems to give
> me a nearly instant and consistent result that works quite well for the
> decisions that I need to make.
> Whether over simplifying or merely eschewing the complex, in the real
> world
> it works for me.
> Tom Sanders
> Lansing, Mi USA