Re: [CR]Frame Geometry and stay length...The angels are dancing onthe head of a pin once more...

(Example: Events:BVVW)

Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 22:37:33 -0400
From: Marcus Coles <marcoles@ody.ca>
To: Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]Frame Geometry and stay length...The angels are dancing onthe head of a pin once more...
References: <006601c79b52$07c45780$6ef02a41@ts> <75d04b480705202155h55668d39i2e48686364a6faf1@mail.gmail.com> <A13A1C27-F3E4-442A-83A3-0B32AA185FD3@earthlink.net> <9327C3B25BD3C34A8DBC26145D88A907064561@hippy.home.here> <8801bb250705210940o5b5812efx35aeb584366e98d9@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8801bb250705210940o5b5812efx35aeb584366e98d9@mail.gmail.com>


Mitch Harris wrote:
>
> On the whole, however, I've found geometry less than helpful for
> predicting
> ride--turns out my most comfortable bike in a century is a Raysport
> with the
> very short 38" wheelbase.
> That's how I feel about mine, surprised the heck out of me, the geometry and possibly tube selection must hold some secret that is not immediately obvious.

I should get it measured and into Dave Mann's Bike Geometry Project and maybe the answer will jump off the spreadsheet.

Marcus Coles
London, Ontario, Canada.