<< I might be mistaken but Matrix may have been the original name for?
what was later called Cromor. >>
That IS correcto!
I wonder if Trek had that trademark issued for "Matrix" that Columbus was not aware of? (Kinda like Off Topic Campagnolo "Daytona" components that had to change &? become "Centaur")
Dale Brown Greensboro, North Carolina USA
-----Original Message----- From: Lee Berg <ventoux@gmail.com> To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org Sent: Tue, 29 May 2007 10:43 am Subject: Re: [CR]Columbus Matrix tubing weight and specs - SL ?
Most dimensions are similar (for at least the early iteration of SL,?
the seat and chain stay thicknesses differ):? ?
? http://www.ventoux.com/
I might be mistaken but Matrix may have been the original name for?
what was later called Cromor.? ?
Lee Berg?
Palo Alto? ?
On 5/29/07, Bianca Pratorius <biankita@comcast.net> wrote:?
> I checked the archives and there is still no definitive answer on?
> whether Matrix tubing sets are equal in specs to SL. Does anyone have a?
> final answer on that??
>?
> Garth Libre in Miami Fl USA?
_______________________________________________?
Classicrendezvous mailing list?
Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org?
http://www.bikelist.org/
________________________________________________________________________ AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.
_______________________________________________
Classicrendezvous mailing list
Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
http://www.bikelist.org/