Re: [CR]Re: Cloisonne goodness from Cinelli (er, correction)

(Example: Framebuilders:Norman Taylor)

In-Reply-To: <b27bc5c00707072225i7d342cfbu363c3abbc8ac1217@mail.gmail.com>
References: <b27bc5c00707061658t3be15d04ka479cc3bd7f685c4@mail.gmail.com> <23ADA947-9E30-433C-AEA1-32C7E2FDF1D1@earthlink.net> <b27bc5c00707071639p4be9d52cm2bf7e23e4f7769da@mail.gmail.com> <C2820BF3-D221-4618-BBB2-5D78E4B8DFB8@earthlink.net>
From: "Chuck Schmidt" <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]Re: Cloisonne goodness from Cinelli (er, correction)
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 22:29:01 -0700
To: CR RENDEZVOUS <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>


On Jul 7, 2007, at 10:25 PM, Tam Pham wrote:
> On 7/7/07, Chuck Schmidt <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net > wrote:
> In the true sense it doesn't matter how the partitions are made.
> They can be made in a casting process, a stamping process, or an
> etching process. When the word cloisonne is used by the general
> public they would be referring to something inlayed with fired
> translucent or opaque glass, not paint.
>
>
> I think it does matter how the partitions are made, though.
> Unbeknownst to me prior to yesterday, cloisonne seems to imply
> techniques that involve attaching patterns to the substrate
> material to create the partitions/cloisons. By removing that step
> there really are no cloisons to speak of.
>
> A couple of good references I've come across:
>
> http://concise.britannica.com/ebc/article-9360986/cloisonne
> http://iweb.tntech.edu/cventura/Cloisonne.htm
>
> Tam Pham
> Huntington Beach, CA - USA

I'm talking about general usage of the term Tam. So I guess we can agree to disagree also.

Chuck Schmidt
South Pasadena, CA USA
http://www.velo-retro.com (reprints, t-shirts & timelines)