[CR]Mojo or Nojo? Was: When is a Masi not a Masi

(Example: Framebuilding)

In-Reply-To: <20070122183428.78703.qmail@web34314.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <20070122183428.78703.qmail@web34314.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
From: "Chuck Schmidt" <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:06:50 -0800
To: "classicrendezvous@bikelist.org ((E-mail))" <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: [CR]Mojo or Nojo? Was: When is a Masi not a Masi

Joe Starck wrote: (snip)
> Aside from the fact that the dimensions of the frame
> remain unaffected, as always though, ride quality is
> subject to post-repair original mojo -- buy hey --like
> Moses transferring HIS mojo to a select 70, did not
> any of Faliero and Alberto's powers alight on ME
> during the time I built Masis on the same fixture
> Mario Confente did? And, I've been to the Vigorelli
> and back.

You definitely possess mojo, JoSta!

Reminds me of a long ago thread on CRlist. It went: Mojo or Nojo?

http://search.bikelist.org/?SearchString=nojo

Chuck Schmidt
South Pasadena, CA USA
http://www.velo-retro.com (reprints, t-shirts & timelines)