Re: [CR]John Thompson and Jerrry Moos are called to the principal's

(Example: Framebuilders)

Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 18:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jerome & Elizabeth Moos <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]John Thompson and Jerrry Moos are called to the principal's
To: Donald Gillies <gillies@cs.ubc.ca>, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
In-Reply-To: <200710030329.l933TFI5009187@cascade.cs.ubc.ca>
cc: johndthompson@gmail.com
cc: johndthompson@gmail.com

Now we have a new day, so I will respond as I did not last night. Steven's so-called "count" was arrived at by adding to my three posts yesterday two posts from the previous night, one at 11:45 PM, one at 12 minutes past midnight. That does indeed add up to 5 posts in 24 hours, but that is not 5 posts in a day, at least not as defined by any sane person. I didn't count John's posts, but I assume Steven applied the same spin to the facts in his case also.

Fortunately Dale is the Listmeister, and I am confident that Dale, unlike some, knows how to count to 3 or to 5.

Regards,

Jerry Moos Big Spring, TX

Donald Gillies <gillies@cs.ubc.ca> wrote: In article Dmitry Yaitskov Writes (about 2 pseudo-suspensions):
> I find this ridiculous. Is it only me? <

Actually, I find it kind of hilarious. John and Jerry are some of the top CR contributors of the past few years, and I value their opinions highly.

And I recognize that when I posting 4, 5, 6 times a day to CR, i'm probably feeling depressed and using CR as an escape or something. When that happens, THE BEST THING IN THE WORLD would be to take a break and instead of posting to CR, go for bike rides instead ... :-) :-) Maybe that should be part of the penance for over-posting ...

- Don Gillies
San Diego, CA, USA