Re: [CR]Belt drive a possibility ? Very far OT Answer

(Example: Racing:Jean Robic)

Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:55:22 +0000 (GMT)
From: <gholl@optonline.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]Belt drive a possibility ? Very far OT Answer
In-reply-to: <337499.96299.qm@web28003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
To: nick Bordo <nicbordeaux@yahoo.fr>
References: <337499.96299.qm@web28003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
cc: Classic Rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>

Hi Nick: This is so far OT as to be censurable by Dale, whose indulgence I ask in this case in order to help another cyclist. Actually, a belt drive is currently being sold by Carbon Drive Systems, a subsidiary of Spot Bicycles. I understand that the system consists of a polyurethane belt, as well as a special made chainring and cog. Since, ostensibly, the belt cannot be broken, a keyed dropout must be used. Therefore, such dropouts will be made for both steel and alu bikes. I imagine more info is available somewhere in cyberspace.
Cordially,
George
George Hollenberg MD
Westport, CT, USA


----- Original Message -----
From: "nick Bordo"
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:29:00 -0000
Subject: [CR]Belt drive a possibility ?
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org


> At the risk of exceeding my 3 per day limit and not being
> vintage: can anyone tell me, preferably onlist, what attempts
> were made in the past at belt drive on bicycles. More
> importantly, how would the best of today's toothbelt drives
> match a chain drive energy loss wise. Because the ideal
> chainline is a straight one (anyone to contradict me on this one
> ?) , and were a energy-efficient beldrive to be feasible, any
> manually commanded expanding rear wheel pulley wheel (see
> mobylette automatic transmissions for the general idea) would
> give the ideal drive system. An expansion factor of 2.2 on the
> back pulley mech would give a more than large enough ratio choice.
>
> If a belt drive is not a possibility, why has nobody attempted
> a straight chainline variable ratio drive with a different type
> of chain then the standard bicycle chain (the possibilities for
> expanding a back "cog" are innumerable). Or have they. They
> probably have, the amount of left by the wayside innovation in
> early cycles is probably greater than in any other field of
> transportation. To clarify this, I have yet to see an
> "innovation" in modern cycling that was not tested or produced
> at one point or another in cycling history, then dropped for
> reasons of cost or else.
>
> Nick March, Mont de Marsan, Landes, France
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails
> vers Yahoo! Mail
>
> _______________________________________________
>

George Hollenberg MD
CT, USA