[CR]Enough already with belt drive & shaft drive....

(Example: Framebuilders:Norman Taylor)

To: rapidfire10ring@hotmail.com, nicbordeaux@yahoo.fr, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:26:30 -0400
In-Reply-To: <738451.8648.qm@web51607.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
From: <oroboyz@aol.com>
Subject: [CR]Enough already with belt drive & shaft drive....

Belt drive and shaft drive all have been tried over and over again, some even within the limits of this forum's time line (!), and all have been commercial flops. Now please stay on topic gents. And sign off properly with your CR posts before I get crazy & start dumping members.? :)

Dale Brown Greensboro, North Carolina USA http://www.classicrendezvous.com

-----Original Message----- From: bruce thomson <masi3v4me@yahoo.com> To: nick Bordo <nicbordeaux@yahoo.fr>; classicrendezvous@bikelist.org Sent: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:52 pm Subject: Re: [CR]Belt drive a possibility ? Or shaft drive?

Nick: Has anyone tried the shaft-drive yet? You know like on the BMW motorcycle? Internal transmission with electric finger switches, just wondering. Now where did I put the phone number of my patent attorney? BT

nick Bordo <nicbordeaux@yahoo.fr> wrote: At the risk of exceeding my 3 per day limit and not being vintage: can anyone tell me, preferably onlist, what attempts were made in the past at belt drive on bicycles. More importantly, how would the best of today's toothbelt drives match a chain drive energy loss wise. Because the ideal chainline is a straight one (anyone to contradict me on this one ?) , and were a energy-efficient beldrive to be feasible, any manually commanded expanding rear wheel pulley wheel (see mobylette automatic transmissions for the general idea) would give the ideal drive system. An expansion factor of 2.2 on the back pulley mech would give a more than large enough ratio choice.

If a belt drive is not a possibility, why has nobody attempted a straight chainline variable ratio drive with a different type of chain then the standard bicycle chain (the possibilities for expanding a back "cog" are innumerable). Or have they. They probably have, the amount of left by the wayside innovation in early cycles is probably greater than in any other field of transportation. To clarify this, I have yet to see an "innovation" in modern cycling that was not tested or produced at one point or another in cycling history, then dropped for reasons of cost or else.

Nick March, Mont de Marsan, Landes, France

--------------------------------- Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail

_______________________________________________

Bruce Thomson Spokane WA 99204 (509) 747 4314 Masi3v4me@yahoo.com

__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com