Re: [CR]John Thompson and Jerrry Moos are called to the principal'soffice

(Example: Framebuilders:Cecil Behringer)

From: "Rod" <rodk3d@comcast.net>
To: "dima" <dima@rogers.com>, "CR" <Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <0a3501c8055b$7293a2a0$0400a8c0@HPLAPTOP> <155354542.20071002215023@rogers.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]John Thompson and Jerrry Moos are called to the principal'soffice
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 04:22:57 -0600
reply-type=original

NO. It's why many of the flock have migrated to the iBob list or Serotta list or the .............. Rod Kronenberg Fort Collins, CO


----- Original Message -----
From: dima
To: CR
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 7:50 PM
Subject: Re: [CR]John Thompson and Jerrry Moos are called to the


principal'soffice


> Hi,
>
> I find this ridiculous. Is it only me?
>
> Tuesday, October 2, 2007, 9:19:29 PM, The Maaslands wrote:
>
>> If you open the following link:
>
>> http://search.bikelist.org/getmsg.asp?Filename=classicrendezvous.10709.
>> 0637.eml
>
>> You can read Dale's very precise desire to limit the number of posts of
>> any CR listmember to 3 per 24 hour period. It is also very clear that as
>> of September 13th, anybody violating this rule would face a one week
>> suspension.
>
>> Given that in the last 24 hours, Jerry has now posted 5 times, and John
>> 4 times, it would appear that they are the first people to infringe this
>> rule. Given that Dale is away and not necessarily able to impose his
>> selected 'punishment', and that both or very correct and gentlemanly
>> fellows, it would only seem fair to me that the two that are in
>> infraction self-suspend themselves for the week. This is also perhaps a
>> good time for all of the rest of us to remember that multiple topics can
>> be combined into one post and all posts should be weighty.
>
>> Steven Maasland
>> Moorestown, NJ
>> USA
>
>> PS: If John or Jerry has some important information that needs to be
>> shared to the complete CR-list during their self-imposed period of
>> suspension, please feel free to send me the information and I will do my
>> best to convey it onwards, as it is my understanding that Dale's
>> suspension rule is not intended to prevent the expression of information
>> or ideas, but rather to simply teach a degree of self-restraint. It
>> would indeed be a pity to lose some important information due to this
>> rule.
>
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Dmitry Yaitskov,
> Toronto, Canada.