Re: [CR]Fixed Gear

(Example: Framebuilders:Tony Beek)

From: "ternst" <ternst1@cox.net>
To: "Cox, Thomas R." <CoxT@MillerCanfield.com>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <CC478E33C8FB0846B2D3BC4B73643E8F0223F5DD@ex2de.mcps.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Fixed Gear
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:19:44 -0800
reply-type=original

Thanks, Tom.
Stiff hub is also correct usage.
Forgot that one last nite.
Ted Ernst
Palos Verdes Estates
CA USA


----- Original Message -----
From: "Cox, Thomas R."
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 8:08 AM
Subject: [CR]Fixed Gear



> Here is my only contribution to the fixed gear debate that has been
> going on. Around Kenosha, Wisconsin in the 1950s, riders at the
> Washington Park Velodrome (and wannabes) referred to their bikes as
> being or having "stiff hubs" not "fixed gears." Any of you other early
> old timers ever hear this usage? Oh, why not one more contribution to
> the debate, hate the sin not the sinner.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tom Cox
> Detroit, Michigan, USA
> __________________________________________________________
> NOTICE TO PERSONS SUBJECT TO UNITED STATES TAXATION (MCPS)
>
> DISCLOSURE UNDER TREASURY CIRCULAR 230: The United States Federal tax
> advice, if any, contained in this document and its attachments may not
> be used or referred to in the promoting, marketing or recommending of
> any entity, investment plan or arrangement, nor is such advice intended
> or written to be used, and may not be used, by a taxpayer for the
> purpose of avoiding Federal tax penalties.