Re: [CR]FB Hi/Lo track hub?

(Example: Framebuilders:Brian Baylis)

From: "Jeff Slotkin" <jeffslotkin@comcast.net>
To: Classic Rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
In-Reply-To: <47790044.2020504@sonic.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]FB Hi/Lo track hub?
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:49:57 -0500
References: <MONKEYFOODGMaAiDTyh0000021c@monkeyfood.nt.phred.org>


I'm not sure I buy "stiffer," but I'd love to be a fly on the wall while you try it out on Jobst. :^o

I think this design is meant to allow spoke replacement with the cog in place.

Jeff Slotkin Charleston, SC

On Dec 31, 2007, at 9:44 AM, Jay S wrote:
> Higher flange equals shorter spokes equals stiffer drive side, which
> is what you want when you're stomping on the pedals.
>
> Jay Sexton
> Sebastopol, CA
>
>
> This one puzzles me.
> ebay item 110209598317
> http://ebay.com/<blah>
>
> why would one need a high low Track hub? I always thought the
> high low hub was designed to compensate for the unequal spoke
> tensions created by dishing on 5 and 6 speed freewheels.
> I also was under the impression that a Track hub will have less
> required dish due to the more symetrical design of the hub.
>
> So, unless I'm totally wrong (wouldn't be the first time)
> whats the rational behind this hub?
>
> Marty Eison
> Frisco, Texas, USA